Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NittanyLion
From what I understand it was "an annual report" written by the Clinton administration. In other words, Bush didn't have a right to say yes or no when it came to releasing it by law. In other words, Bush would violate the law if his administration failed to release it.
1,247 posted on 06/04/2002 10:37:47 AM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1244 | View Replies ]


To: marajade
From what I understand it was "an annual report" written by the Clinton administration. In other words, Bush didn't have a right to say yes or no when it came to releasing it by law. In other words, Bush would violate the law if his administration failed to release it.

That's what I suspect as well. There are way too many reports published for the WH to proofread every one. That's part of the problem when you're heading a massive bureaucracy - things are done in your name with which you may disagree.

1,251 posted on 06/04/2002 10:46:01 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson