Skip to comments.
Climate Action Report 2002(NYT's Bush's U-Turn report)
US. EPA Global Warming ^
| May 2002
| Various EPA studies
Posted on 06/02/2002 7:46:20 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: jla
I'm not defending Bush, I want to expose the layers of junk science building up to the new phrenology on a global level. The weather service can't predict next Sunday's weather with great accuracy, I don't trust the entire greenhouse research complex enough to even contemplate altering the entire country's economic future based on their compounding junk science. Atlas Shrugged is about to become reality in the countries who maintain their Kyoto obligations, or so says jerseyHighlander.
These bureaucracies produce so much internet information I've spent the last two hours just looking through their layers of .....
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: Freedomm;Admin Moderator
Freedomm -- member since May 28th, 2002Why do I expect that you were somebody else until a few minutes ago?
Comment #44 Removed by Moderator
Comment #45 Removed by Moderator
To: bloggerjohn
a) I don't think much of the 'science' behind global-warming theory.
b) If the elected administration believes otherwise, the govt scientists have choice: shut up, or quit.
Since this is a highly politicized issue, the EPA should never have released this report without clearing it with the WH. It was done (with the NY Slimes apparently getting advanced preview) to embarass the President politically.
To: Diddle E. Squat
Thanks, Nick Danger is spot on (I hope).
To: deport
Thanks for the ping, deport!
There is actually a fair bit of scientific debate on whether or not global warming is occuring, and if so, what the effects would be. One model has more water evaporating from equatorial regions, leading to more clouds, which would reflect some of the sun's energy back into space, which would cool everything back off....
I'm not convinced it's happening yet.
48
posted on
06/02/2002 9:05:01 PM PDT
by
Amelia
To: semper_libertas
Unless of course a conservative administration ever comes to power. We have one. You're just too reactionary to recognize it.
49
posted on
06/02/2002 9:05:36 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: Freedomm
Yeah, but do YOU understand what that giant Taco Bell bulls-eye target in the Pacific Ocean allegedly for the falling satellite last year was REALLY used for?
It is the key to all, and our last hope. Happy sleuthing, while there is still a little time.
To: Freedomm
Since 1992 California's popultion has increased due to immigration 25%, TX 20%, Arizona 18%, NY 25%, PA 20%, Michigan 20%, Ohio 15%, Washington 20%, I could go on but you get the picture.
You got data to back that up I'm sure?
Census data for 2000 vs 1990, total population growth.....
CA = 13.82% increase
TX = 22.76%
NY = 5.48%
PA = 3.36%
You get the Picture I'm sure.....
51
posted on
06/02/2002 9:09:45 PM PDT
by
deport
To: Amelia
Well the weather where I live has been crazy for the past 20 years. Of course, I do live in Michigan. ;)
52
posted on
06/02/2002 9:11:42 PM PDT
by
rintense
To: JerseyHighlander
Thanks. The media will only report the sections they want the public to hear and ignore the rest.
To: deport, freedomm
Ah deport, you forget to count the underground(literal) population. Alien invaders from China, burrowing from a Pacific beach down through the earth core to build secret underground invasion staging cities beneath Los Angeles and the Bay Area. Their existance is denied, as they wait for the signal and the time to strike. Y2K was just a cover for a resupply effort(bomb shelter that were actually portholes), led by Ross Perot(codename Groundhog).
You don't REALLY believe those earthquakes were caused by just fault lines? Its just another cover story.
To: deport
TX = 22.76%
And that growth was from people moving to a State where GWB was governor. Includes my brother and sister-in-law. And next census will probably have some more of our clan.
To: sinkspur
I see a lot of hot air...
56
posted on
06/02/2002 9:22:31 PM PDT
by
woofie
Comment #57 Removed by Moderator
To: deport
My swimming pool has a leak in it and my 8 year old daughter told me "Well we are having a drought, you know"
58
posted on
06/02/2002 9:24:49 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: Pokey78
DON'T WORRY! The Bushies have it RIGHT!
Making the Global Warming thing BUSH OFFICIAL, has NOTHING to do with Bush making a U-TURN! No! Drudge is simply a right-wing nut, and the Bushies are probably right, that Drudge guy he was just picking on Clinton, just like he's picking on Bushman. Drudge, and conservative nuts like him, they just don't respect the office of President of the United States. Anyway, making it (global warming earth in the balance) OFFICIAL only means that AL GORE WAS RIGHT, but, Bush is going to do it, the Buffalo Bush La CucaRockefeller Republican shindig INCREMENTALLY (maybe). That's the bottom line, it's going to be a nice glide into public transportation, so don't sweat it, just keep staring at your Bush and Laura photos and stuff. And, now that the Bush Administration, basically, has said that in fact Al "Earth in the Balance" Gore was right on this global warming thing and auto emissions and all, I guess that means we elected the wrong guy to office considering that, with yet another Bush-U-Turn towards the (barbed) left, and in particular on this issue, then Bush was up until now wrong on the issue, and so I suppose if the Bushies are saying in effect Al Gore was right all along it would have probably have made sense to elect the guy who had it right all along instead of wrong?
Right?
No! They are NOT saying that! The difference between Al Gore and Buffalo Bush is this, and THIS ONLY! Bush is a REPUBLICAN! And, Al Gore is NOT. Now do you understand? Maybe this ISN'T a U-TURN! Maybe this is a INSIDE-OUT TURN! Or maybe this is another Bush secret plan, that we just don't understand the big picture yet, but just trust Bush on this one - it all has to do with our war on (Islamic) terrorism or something. Don't worry, the Bushies will explain it all to us shortly so that we can be in on the "turn of the card" that Bush has up his sleeve on this one - don't worry, it's all part of a game plan to legerdemain the libs at their own game to defeat terrorism through political correctness, and, after all, if we get rid of oil and gas and automobiles and stuff, we won't have to rely on those Arab countries for all that oil. Get it? And, the bottom line is, as the Buffalo Bush Administration is now saying, global warming is caused by humans, you can forget about drilling for oil in the frozen tundra because the idea isn't to find more oil that feeds those autos, the idea is to go back to a world lit only by fire.
By the way, how's our borders? Safe?
To: Brian_Baldwin
You've been posting that bullshit all over FR tonight.
It's boilerplate that means NOTHING.
You've been debunked Brian, as you've been debunked every time you've posted on this website.
Why don't you remain a lurker and avoid the embarrassment?
60
posted on
06/02/2002 9:30:04 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-160 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson