Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sum Of All Fears...Horrible Beyond Words
myself | 6-1-02 | my favorite headache

Posted on 06/01/2002 12:32:59 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-176 next last
To: My Favorite Headache
I didnt think it was that bad.

We do need to remember that neo-nazis were responsible for the 2nd largest terrorist attack in American history (Mcveigh, OKC). So I dont object too awfully strongly to the use of neo-nazis as the bad guys.

All in all, the book was infinately better, though. I was hoping maybe they'd show more interesting shots of a post-nuclear explosion (that would be a useful film to make, eh?), but it totaled what-- a minute?

I thought the new Star Wars was a better current movie.

81 posted on 06/01/2002 8:58:15 AM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy
No
82 posted on 06/01/2002 9:00:11 AM PDT by Zebra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: stiga bey
"Why don't the "outed" conservatives in Hollywood like Schwartzenegger, Selleck, Willis, Woods, etc., pool their money and resources and start a new studio?"

I would say that this is nearly impossible because the Hollywood Unions would quitely strangle the effort by underhanded means (Silent Boycotts, and whisper campaigns)

83 posted on 06/01/2002 9:02:41 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Katya
Right wing????Who was right wing? The Neo-Nazi's? You weren't classifying them as right wing? Were you?>>>

Remember when the 2nd in command of getting this bomb (name slips my mind right now, but he was blown up in his car at the end), anyway he was talking about what a great time it was to be alive and how the right wing has come together etc....I was not taking a poke at it.

84 posted on 06/01/2002 9:09:02 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ex con
In the book it isn't a nuke blast, it is a fizzle, basically a dirty bomb as the fission or the fusion failed to occur.
Half right. As I remember, the Isreali nuke was a pure fission weapon.
However, once the uranium had been extracted, the terrorists managed to create fission-fusion weapon, with the fission reaction setting off the fusion reaction.

Now the bomb DID fizzle as far as setting off the fusion reaction, but the fission reaction DID occur, toasting a good portion of denver in the process.
85 posted on 06/01/2002 9:10:27 AM PDT by Saturnalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
If you think THAT is implausable, go read some Heinlein.
Everyone has multiple doctorates, usual military service and some other superhuman trait.

Oh and the women do all this while pregnant.
86 posted on 06/01/2002 9:12:30 AM PDT by Saturnalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jude24; OKCSubmariner
We do need to remember that neo-nazis were responsible for the 2nd largest terrorist attack in American history (Mcveigh, OKC). So I dont object too awfully strongly to the use of neo-nazis as the bad guys.

What kind of left-field pseudo-thinking led you to that conclusion....McVeigh's bad hair cut????? McVeigh was simply a patsy without an original thought in his miserable existence.

As to the movie, I am a big Clancy fan that hates hearing and reading how the book plot has been subjected to the usual Hollyweird PC perversion of the story. OTOH, I did enjoy the trailer when I saw it at Star Wars-AOTC.

87 posted on 06/01/2002 9:17:51 AM PDT by T-Bird45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
Lot`sa folks are forgetting other parts of the book like the IDF officer that murders a Palestian protester, the fact that Israeli planes would fly with nukes, and how the book ends,Jerusalem controlled by a tripart made up of Jews, Arabs, and Christians
That's how it began. The book ends with the Saudis executing the terrorists according to Islamic Law.

Clancy's books show that while he respects the Israelis, he sees that they have serious flaws and he also has a great deal of respect for the Saudis.

-Eric

88 posted on 06/01/2002 9:33:44 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Rush was just saying last week that Clancy is one of the few writers who actually IS involved in the production process of any of his works. I doubted it when Affleck was cast as Ryan.
I heard that Affleck spent some time with Clancy before he got the role and TC was actually impressed with him.

-Eric

89 posted on 06/01/2002 9:35:47 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
I'm tired of hollywad deciding what is and is not good for us to see on screen - especially when political correctness is involved.

Maybe you should try some of the foreign and independent cinema being made, and avoid the "blockbusters". They are ALL about money, not purity of message. The indie films are all about breaking the blockbuster rules, as they know up front they'll be lucky to make a little profit.

And they are almost always more interesting, leaving at least something of an impression.

90 posted on 06/01/2002 9:42:28 AM PDT by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: laredo44
The most likely scenario to actually pull something like this off, besides the fundamentalist muslims, are the wacko greens.

I wonder what they are going to do with Rainbow 6?

Hey I know! Let's make it the white farmers in Zimbabwe. Bitter over having their stolen land returned to its rightful owners who are of course growing wonderful organic crops and feeding the world.

a.cricket

91 posted on 06/01/2002 9:49:38 AM PDT by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Springman
PING - You have to call a Spade a Spade if you don't it will Kick you in the A*S sooner than later!
92 posted on 06/01/2002 9:53:31 AM PDT by Wave Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy
Ummm... am I the only one here on Free Republic who hated Arlington Road for the typical Tim Robbins evil right-wing kneejerk paranoia garbage that it is?

Nope. That was my reaction too. Plus they had to show a Boy Scout type organization as the Future Fascists of America.

The best movie on terrorism IMHO is still Black Sunday. Darn good book too, which Hollywood had the sense to keep the movie script faithful to.

93 posted on 06/01/2002 9:59:39 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bird humming
What Galpal? Ryan is married to a Opthalmic Surgeon. Did I miss a divorce? Or is this Hollywood's way of injecting their moral values into what was a good storyline.
94 posted on 06/01/2002 10:02:31 AM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SAJ; SauronOfMordor
Perfect! Thank you for taking your time to recite all the topics/subjects/themes in Clancy's book that the socialist slime in Hollywood refused to include.

Actually the first two items were included in the movie. Although it didn't come anywhere close to the book, much to my surprise I actually enjoyed it. Different genre, but it was much better than Attack of the Clones. It certainly could have been done better, but was not the disaster I was expecting.

95 posted on 06/01/2002 10:06:26 AM PDT by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
What Galpal? Ryan is married to a Opthalmic Surgeon. Did I miss a divorce? Or is this Hollywood's way of injecting their moral values into what was a good storyline.

I think it's Hollywood's attempt to draw younger audiences, just like casting Affleck as Jack Ryan. It seems the older action stars like Harrison Ford are not drawing young people to the theaters, so Hollywood is now trying to promote younger actors like Affleck and Matt Damon in action roles.

96 posted on 06/01/2002 10:17:18 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
"I heard that Affleck spent some time with Clancy before he got the role and TC was actually impressed with him. "

I recall Clancy telling an interviewer that he tried to persuade Hollywood to use someone younger than Harrison Ford for that IRA movie because the Ryan character starts out in his twenties and ages gradually through the Clancy CIA novels. By anyones measure, Ford is now too old to be a believable Ryan.

97 posted on 06/01/2002 10:19:03 AM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I disagree with you about Clancy being a lousy writer. Actually, anyone who sells millions of books is by defintion a good writer. It may not be great literature, but then popular fiction should be judged on the basis of whether people will fork over money and spend the time reading it. Writers like Clancy, King and Grishom are successful in doing so over and over, and that's not easy. It's like musicians who criticize three minute pop songs for being too simple. It may seem simple, but try writing a hit song with the same three chords that doesn't sound like all the other ones, and suddenly that's not so easy. Clancy's books do tend to drag for the first two or three hundred pages, but after that the different story lines start to come together and I can't put it down. It takes a good writer to do that.

I agree with you about Without Remorse being Clancy's best book though. Now that would make a great movie if the script actually followed the book. But who to cast as the young John Clark?

98 posted on 06/01/2002 10:34:07 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
I mean Ben Affleck aka Jack Ryan managed to outlive a nuclear blast and still use his cell phone and find his girlfriend at the same time!

What I don't understand is how his cell phone would have been able to work in the area affected by the nuclear blast. I would have thought that the EMP from the nuclear explosion would have knocked out all the cell phone towers plus most or the electronic devices in Baltimore.

99 posted on 06/01/2002 10:59:39 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
Accepting the part as Doolittle was unbelievably hypocritical on Baldwins part. The guy's been showing up on Politically Incorrect spouting his liberal views...I believe he was even quoted saying that the Election of 2000 was as big a tragedy as 911...he's got eyes on public office..
100 posted on 06/01/2002 11:10:22 AM PDT by in the Arena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson