[Dinsdale]

Prove it ... idiot. /sarcasm

Funny thing is they don't disclose their funding.

I can only infer it. They seem to wuv micosoft and MCSEs. At least half the MCSEs I've delt with are oxygen thieves (about the same ratio as CNEs and, I'm sorry to say, only slightly worse then BSEEs). Theirs study 'shows' that MCSEs are good at what they do. Ergo their credibilty is suspect.

Another interesting quote found on slashdot. Senior MS exec. 'We can't disclose source because some of it is so flawed (Message queing and others not listed,) that is would be a national security issue to release it.'

[TechJunkYard]

Funny thing is they don't disclose their funding.

Yeah, but somebody else does.

[Bush2000]

Funny thing is they don't disclose their funding. I can only infer it.

If you can't prove an assertion, you should state up front that it's your opinion. In all honesty, I set you up for failure because I've never read anything which describes the source of de Tocquville's funding. But merely asserting your opinion as fact doesn't fly around here.