How so? Just because an accusation is made before the paper is published doesn't make it slanderous. Sure, it might turn out that way, but who's to know? As I said before, AdTI seems to have a certain mindset, when it comes to the papers they present.
No, bob. Wrong. If you want to state your opinion, fine. But if you want to assert that opinion as fact, uh uh. No way. Nonsense. Evidence is based on fact. If you don't have evidence, don't bother unless you want to be labeled an idiot.
What are you getting at? Notice the wording in my original post, there is a careful use of 'seem' in my statement. Are you looking for things in my post that aren't there?
But asserting one as "superior" is a religious issue.
That's why it'll be interesting to see where the paper goes.