Feldman wanted to suppress evidence of DW's alledged porno pictures, saying it has no bearing on the disappearance of the child and would inflame the jury.
The prosecution will attempt to introduce videos or photographs of Danielle in life. This is highly prejudicial evidence, and irrelevant..because their admission would violate Westerfields Constitutional rights to a fair trial free of inflammatory information.
Again, it will inflame the jury to see Danielle's happy face, followed by Westerfields alledged pornographic pictures.
They have to show it, because it's their ONLY motive for DW alledgedly going after Danielle.
The van Dams are the victims, so they will get a pass on their alledged transgressions, with the exception of THAT night.
It should work both ways. But life isn't fair, now is it.
sw