Replies

Liddy Dolt is not a fit replacement for Jesse Helms. When the spineless wimpette (I'm rich therefore a Senate seat is my birthright) is whipped by Erskine Bowles, don't even dare THINK about suggesting that it is the fault of real Republicans. Other than the same old tired Tinkerbell (thanks Clemenza) Trent Lott BS that the really important thing is to have a GOP majority so that coruuption can flow through him,....whoops, so that the Republic will be safe from his precise corrupt counterparts like Daschle, just what is the argument for nominating Dolt who will be influenced by dear hubby to raise taxes whenever possible, will discover that she really is not pro-life or pro-gun after all and will discover that, in fairness, we cannot stop Bruce from marrying Lance and adopting. Puhleeze. I suppose that most Republicans will vote for her on the judicial nominee question but they may be disappointed in the unlikely event that she wins. Hopefully, at her age, she has one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel. The only gray matter she has ever had is her hair when not dyed. Start finding actual Americans and actual Republicans and actually moral people to run against and defeat Edwards and to prepare the recapture of Helms' Senate seat no matter which of the apprent slime nominees slithers through this year's process. Take the governorship too just in case we get lucky and need to appoint a replacement for Liddy Bowles or Erskine Dolt.

If Dole loses because Republicans stay home, how can you not blame Republicans?

Also, FReepers can huff and puff, but Dole will win independent voters and some white women Democrats and even if a few pig-headed FReepers stay home, Dole will still win.

Dole isn't absent of gray matter no matter how much you say it. She graduated with distinction from Duke University and was a member of Phi Beta Kappa. She earned a degree from Harvard Law School and also holds a master's degree in education and government from Harvard. She's also a good manager--she chose Ari Fleischer as her 2000 campaign spokesman (a guy that Harvard MBA Bush picked as his WH press secretary).

Is it that you don't believe her? She says she will support making the tax cuts permanent. She supports school prayer & the display of the 10 Commandments in schools. She supported Bush's decision to abandon the ABM treaty & Test Ban treaty. She supports SDI. She believes that the drug problem is also a demand problem. She supports Prop 187. She didn't blame guns or TV for Columbine-- she blamed a lack of support for discipline in schools. She supports privatization of government activities because of superior accountability and because private enterprise only can create economic prosperity. She opposes judicial activism-- like what the Florida SC did. She supports instant background checks for gun sales rather than waiting periods while checks are made. She supports school vouchers and school choice for parents with children in failing schools. She opposes internet sales taxes.

Why do you think she's a RINO?