[ConsistentLibertarian]

"you are using the logical fallacy of the excluded middle." Do you really understand what you're talking about? If you don't, I'll just let it go. But if you _really_ want to (a) deny exluded middle and/or (b) argue that I'm assuming it, we're in for a sh.tload of fun. You're call baby.

[AndrewC]

"you are using the logical fallacy of the excluded middle." Do you really understand what you're talking about?

I do. You have been trying and failing to get me to play your game. I have refused to do that. You have essentially put words into my mouth and created a straw man to beat up. You brought up broken timepieces and argued using them. I have not answered that. You then contend to medved that someone is asserting something with those broken timepieces. Who is that? I told you what imperfect things implied to me. You don't accept that. Fine. Now buzz off.