Replies

"The best evidence available is that [...] more than one set of hands was involved in [designing life]". Ahhh. So the best available evidence refutes the fundamentalist Judeo-Christian theory that all life was designed by a single, perfect being. You don't say.

Evolutionists work overtime trying to keep abiogenesis and evolution separate. The idea is that if you get good enough with the ad hominems, you might could avoid having to defend two assinine ideological doctrines at the same time.

All rational observers view abiogenesis as impossible. In any rational scheme of things, intelligence has to arise first and create biology, and this original intelligence in the universe is indistinguishable from the notion of God. The idea of having biology arise from nothing via combinations of random events and then create intelligence is clearly unworkable.

Once you already have life forms on the Earth, i.e. once you are past the problem of abiogenesis, you do not need God to get more of them. In fact, there is no reasonable way to picture God having to go through 100 kinds of horses to get to the three or four he wanted. Clearly something else was at work in past ages on this planet.

I do not have an explaination for the precise mechanism which was being used, but I do have an explaination for where the raw compute power for that sort of thing came from.