Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
Solution, not air, yes. But the waters were oxygen-poor.

Schopf in Cradle of Life says in part:

Yet the presence of these remarkable deposits does not mean the oceans were oxygen-rich. On the contrary, BIFs were nearly always deposited in large basins, hundreds of kilometers in length and breadth, and the dissolved ferrous iron from which BIFs form could be spread over such vast distances only if carried by waters that were oxygen-poor. Huge amounts of molecular oxygen were pumped into the environment by oxygenic (cyanobacterial) photosynthesis, but except locally, near where it was produced, amounts of oxygen were kept low by its capture and rapid burial in the oxide minerals of BIFs.

You forgot to deal with the pyrites and I forgot to mention the uraninite. From Icon of Obfuscation:

Chapter 2: Miller-Urey experiment

Prebiotic Oxygen. A key question in origin-of-life research is the oxidation state of the prebiotic atmosphere (the current best guess is that the origin of life occurred somewhere around 4.0-3.7 bya (billion years ago)). Wells wants you to think that there is good evidence for significant amounts free oxygen in the prebiotic atmosphere (significant amounts of free oxygen make the atmosphere oxidizing and make Miller-Urey-type experiments fail). He spends several pages (14-19) on a pseudo-discussion of the oxygen issue, citing sources from the 1970's and writing that (p. 17) "the controversy has never been resolved", that "Evidence from early rocks has been inconclusive," and concluding that the current geological consensus -- that oxygen was merely a trace gas before approximately 2.5 bya and only began rising after this point -- was due to "Dogma [taking] the place of empirical evidence" (p. 18). None of this is true (see e.g. Copley, 2001).

Why does Wells leave out the converging independent lines of geological evidence pointing to an anoxic early (pre ~2.5 bya) atmosphere?


326 posted on 05/30/2002 7:04:29 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Why does Wells leave out the converging independent lines of geological evidence pointing to an anoxic early (pre ~2.5 bya) atmosphere?

I don't know. I did not cite Wells. I cited a link to Duke University chemistry resources. This was from a link JediGirl gave. You apparently didn't read it or you may not understand oxidation/reduction. I answered your problem with the atmosphere and BIF. Please note: Oxygen is not needed for oxidation to occur or for something to be considered oxidizing.

348 posted on 05/30/2002 7:59:17 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson