Skip to comments.
Defiant Pakistan threatens to use nuke
Yahoo News India ^
| 05.30.02
| Press Trust of India
Posted on 05/30/2002 5:50:13 AM PDT by callisto
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: callisto
"I must have hurricane season my mind or something to have called him Mansoon. lol!"LOL! Don't feel bad...it took me WEEKS before I could get his name right. I enjoy his interviews too...as long as he's allowed to speak. The left accuses him of tinfoil hat sensationalism, but I've always gotten the impression, from his dry way of speaking, that this guy knows what he's talking about. The world needs to listen more closely to him.
To: Paul C. Jesup
Yeah, I know. Haven't seen that flick since '88 but remembered Chuck ranting about "the cobalt bomb" :-)
To: Paul C. Jesup
And I used to know what cobalt encasement would mean in an exchange, but have since lapsed in that. Something about keeping the fallout "viable" for longer periods of time, isn't it?
To: Darth Sidious
It makes the area where the nuke was used and where the fallout happens, much more radioactive.
To: katana
I don't think it will result in the end of the world. I do think that there might be some effects on our environment, particularly if the weather conditions facilitate the fallout spread.
Another aspect of this is that it lowers the bar (yet again) on what it is acceptable for people to do to each other. Pakistan drops it, India sends one back...maybe a few other cities get hit. The probability of the further use of nuclear weapons becomes greater after this incident. Its sort of a Pandoras's Box that just can't end well.
The really sick thing here is that terrorist organizations are instigating and provoking this situation in India and Pakistan and they seem to be getting exactly what they want.
45
posted on
05/30/2002 8:13:12 AM PDT
by
Cicero5
To: callisto
If we were to apply the US's terror alert color system to this mess, what would the color be? From the mildest threat to severe threat, if I'm not mistaken, the colors are green, blue, yellow, orange, red. I think I would put it at orange.
46
posted on
05/30/2002 8:14:48 AM PDT
by
Snowy
To: Paul C. Jesup
Only in SE Asia? Oh well thats better. And by the way which country do you think is going to get stuck with the tab for providing medical aid and clean-up? My guess is the USA.
47
posted on
05/30/2002 8:15:38 AM PDT
by
Cicero5
To: Cicero5
That is a possibility.
To: The Duke
I say let's make a little popcorn and sit on the sidelines and see what happens.You might just see a huge radioactive cloud of early death floating your way from the other side of the world. I know that volcano plumes have been known to reach up into the jet stream and effect the weather thousands of miles away from the eruption. Why wouldn't nuclear blasts do the same thing with radioactive particles?
To: Paul C. Jesup
Yeah, I mean if you think about it, they are saying that 12 million people COULD die from this incident. 12 million bodies? Sanitation conditions (which are already terrible in those two countries would get dramatically worse. Imagine trying to do the clean-up. It will take an unbelievably amount of resources.
50
posted on
05/30/2002 8:24:22 AM PDT
by
Cicero5
To: Cicero5
I am just how they are going to convine the American People that sending U.S. troops into the rad-zones is a good idea.
To: Walkin Man
Dude, we were setting off nukes INSIDE THE US for most of the 1950s, and we're still OK.
52
posted on
05/30/2002 8:29:21 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: callisto
Pakistan's strategy of nuclear blackmail is paying off. You can be sure the princes of riyadh and the mullahs of teheran are taking careful notes.
Mush's two faced double dealing strategy is the epitomy of PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.
And the concept of nuclear blackmail as a plank of foreign policy has now been enshrined and validated. Looks for its next manifestations closer to, and eventually in the US.
To: Cicero5
I agree. This can not happen. The ramifications are staggering just from a limited exchange. Plus it gives the Islamic fanatics more of a reason to get nukes.
54
posted on
05/30/2002 8:31:05 AM PDT
by
rintense
To: Poohbah
THe human cost on the subcontinent would be tragic and awesome. But the US, USSR, China and France set off HUNDREDS of atmospheric atomic tests into the 60's. Strontium in milk cows, sure. But no more than what was there in the 50's and 60's.
Also, Pakistan would have to let all its nukes fly at once. Question is what are pakistan's red line threshold in case of an indian offensive in kashmir or elsewhere?
To: swarthyguy
What would happen? Pakistan destroys a few Indian cities.
The Indian Army proceeds to destroy Pakistan the old-fashioned way, and America publicly hems and haws (a la how we did with Israel recently). India saves the nukes for keeping China out of the fray.
56
posted on
05/30/2002 8:39:19 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Poohbah
Does India have the means to deliver the nukes against China?
To: aristeides
Enough to hit Western China. If they mount launchers on a tramp freighter, they have a poor man's Polaris system, and they can cover the only part of China that actually makes a profit (the Shanghai/Hong Kong, or "ShangKong," region).
58
posted on
05/30/2002 8:54:04 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Poohbah
Could that be the mission of India's one aircraft carrier? I understand they're not sending it to the Pakistani coast because it is vulnerable to Pakistani air superiority.
To: aristeides
The carrier is too easily identified--the missile ship would have to transit Malacca Strait. Better to use a rusty and anonymous freighter.
60
posted on
05/30/2002 9:10:59 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson