Coming from a legal family background, I know it is the job of the defense attorney to create "A REASONABLE DOUBT" That's all the lawyer is doing.....placing other scenerios in the pot...trying to create that DOUBT! Anyone in the know, knows that! Forget your suspect....He just doesn't fit. He's a redd herring! That's why Greta wasn't taken in, nor am I! We know these legal games and even expect them.
Ease your mind. I am not "taken in". My view of Ingmar is not colored by Geragos or Greta. It's by the nature location and timing of the crime, and statements made by Ingmar, his vitims, his arresting officer, and his judge, in the light of what knowlege I have gained about the patterns of behaviour of certain kinds of criminals.
I haven't abandoned Condit as someone with some 'splaining to do. If I could wish him guilty, I would. Nothing would give me more personal satisfaction.
However, I feel a disspassionate look at Chandra's murder includes both specifically Ingmar and the possibility of another killer of his ilk.