Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross
>>>... it appears he is willfully derelict in some key portions of his duty. The surmise is that he is just faithfully following his father's dogma about a new world order.

I don't buy into any of your assertions. I see absolutely no truth in any of the remarks contained in your last post. This new world order stuff is nothing but paranoia feeding fringe extremist propaganda.

It's not my opinions that are driving public support of President Bushes job approval, but rather the American people and that includes overwhelming numbers of conservatives.

>>>So it would simply appear I have a big job ahead to educate them about GWB.

Folks aren't listening to the trashtalk you have to offer. You can express your opinion, but when it crosses the line, expect folks like me to be there and denounce your distortions and exaggerations.

>>>As for being a Bush-basher, I voted for him over Gore, I paid big bucks to get him in, then he 'Moved On' and ignored his oath of office and failed to prosecute the outgoing criminals...

More exaggerated rhetoric and more Bush bashing. The hatred you have for President Bush is quite revealing and that's why, I'm not so sure you voted for him. To reverse your support for Bush, after a mere 16 months in office is irrational behavior. As for prosecuting Clinton and CO., thats always been a dead issue. President Bush said, he had no desire to go down that road and after three different IC`s had little success, its was politically stupid to attempt any investigations. That would only waste the taxpayers money and besides, American's wanted Bush to move on.

>>>And if you were really a Reaganite you would know it in your bones, and not be sticking up for him.

I've spent 35 years involved in American politics, at one level or another and I can honestly say, I think George W.Bush is doing a fine job as president and I'm proud to support him. You're right, Bush43 is no Ronald Reagan. There was only one Reagan and if he could voice his opinion today, I believe he'd be firmly behind our President. While critizing elected officials, is our civic duty, standing by the President and supporting his efforts, is the patriotic thing to do, especially with America at war. If you consider yourself a real American, start acting like one.

157 posted on 05/31/2002 3:24:41 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man
As for prosecuting Clinton and CO., thats always been a dead issue. President Bush said, he had no desire to go down that road and after three different IC`s had little success, its was politically stupid to attempt any investigations. That would only waste the taxpayers money and besides, American's wanted Bush to move on.

You are wrong. Most American's don't have a clue of the scope and seriousness of the crimes Clinton and company committed. That information was kept from them by the liberal media. For example, most of the media didn't even bother to tell the public about the alleged rapes. They didn't mention Sid Blumenthal lying under oath in an impeachment trial about lying under oath. I doubt 5 percent of the public are aware of the nefarious circumstances surrounding the death of Ron Brown. It is not that the public is lazy or would want our government to move-on in such serious matters as election tampering, blackmail of Congress, treason and murder. It is that this information was DELIBERATELY kept from them. And this information is STILL being deliberately kept from them ... but this time by the GOP.

Here is just one of many examples. The RNC website didn't even bother to mention the Riady Non-Refund disclosure, a blockbuster issue if there ever was one for the Republicans. Imagine ... the democRATS are caught accepting MILLIONS of illegal contributions from a foreign source with strong ties to the Red Chinese Military. When this is discovered they claim they have returned the money. Then the man who gave the money, while under a plea agreement which he looses if he lies, tells the judge that they did NOT give back the money. And the RNC and GOP ignore this. Unbelievable ... BUT TRUE.

These are NOT dead issues.

There is NO statute of limitations on TREASON and MURDER. Ron Brown, by all appearances, was murdered (along with 34+ others) to keep him from testifying about the illegal fundraising being done by the Clinton administration and the trading of US Secrets and restricted technology for those contributions. And the GOP doesn't seem to care. Wonder why?

There has been no accounting of what happened in Filegate that we can trust. We STILL do not know how many ILLEGAL files were really taken. We STILL do not know if those files were returned. We STILL do not know if the information in those files is STILL on DNC databases and computers. We simply do not know whether Republicans and our representatives are being blackmailed. And the GOP doesn't appear at all interested in finding out. Wonder why?

And if you can't see the difference between the highly politicized efforts of Fiske, Starr and Ray (all Clinton approved by the way and all who did things that make their efforts HIGHLY suspect) and what an HONEST DOJ and FBI could do, you can only be a democRAT.

As I've said. NO EXCUSES. Bush either upholds his oath of office and duty according to the Constitution to FAITHFULLY EXECUTE the laws of this land or I will join Paul Ross in not voting for him should he run again. But I'll do more. I'll be a persistent thorn in the side to those on FreeRepublic who choose to cheerlead for Bush and ignore his deriliction of duty. As far as I'm concerned, there is nothing that Bush can do that is more important than protecting the sanctity of our election process and ensuring that our representatives are not being blackmailed or murdered. Terrorists can't destroy what our country stands for but Bush can ... if he ignores these matters, proving that leaders and party members are indeed above the law ... if he makes it possible (likely!) that democRATS will do the same (or worse!) in the future ... if he sends a message to Republicans that suggests the laws will only be enforced if it is politically expedient (because then Republicans will be more likely to commit and cover up crimes too).

NO EXCUSES, move-on'er.

171 posted on 06/01/2002 5:22:16 PM PDT by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson