Replies

Your use of the word "undoubtedly" in post 239 implies that you never read 103 before it was thrown into the memory hole. Your assertion that is was ad hominem attack confirms it.

I did. It was no such thing. It was a well-reasoned, well-thought out refutation of much of Johnson's thinking. Reasonable people may disagree about how well post 103 made it's case, but...well, no they won't, not any more. Post 103 is an unpost. That person is an unperson.

It is lucky for the C side that 103 does not exist. Now they will never have to trouble themselves about dealing with it, or answering it. And they can continue on in ignorance, secure in the knowledge that there was never a post 103, nor were any problems with Johnson ever noted by such an unperson.