So you would favor electing the son of a senator over the son of a shoe salesman? Rich and wealthy Al Gore over the "self-made" Ronald Reagan?
Not on my life would I favor Gore, simply because he too is a 'son of the rich'. I favor those who identify with this country, its traditions and vital institutions. Being obscenely wealthy is not a guarantee of that, and as RR and other true statesmen demonstrate, loyalty and integrity can be found in those of middle class upbringing -- otherwise, we would be looking at President Gore right now! It's the oppositional, us vs. them mentality, whipping up the fears and suspicions of the resentful, that we must eschew.
I will say, however, that Al Gore, being wedded to wealth, would not have been the foreign policy disaster that BC was -- but still a far cry from Bush 43!