Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Without an Attorney, Boy Falters Before Judge
St. Petersburg Times ^ | 5/28/02 | Kathryn Wexler

Posted on 05/28/2002 5:04:16 PM PDT by marshmallow

TAMPA -- The 16-year-old boy sat before the Hillsborough County judge, asking for an attorney. He didn't understand what was going on, he kept saying.

Juan Carlos Elias was in the middle of a restitution hearing. He had pleaded guilty to stealing one car and burglarizing another. Reimbursing the victim was the issue at hand now.

But Elias said he didn't know what restitution meant. His frustrated mother repeatedly rose from the first row, instructing her son in Spanish.

Judge Richard Nielsen, relatively new to the bench, had her tossed out of his courtroom.

"You don't have a lawyer, Mr. Elias," Nielsen said. "So you're going to represent yourself in this matter."

And so, for more than two hours on May 6, the 16-year-old struggled to deal with the arcane language and procedures of a courtroom. It was a scene unfamiliar to some observers. Under Florida law, juveniles are entitled to legal counsel unless they and their parents waive that right.

"Mr. Elias, any objection to these exhibits?" Nielsen asked at one point, referring to car repair bills submitted as evidence.

"I don't have nobody representing me?" said Elias. "I don't understand these things."

"Show these to Mr. Elias," Nielsen instructed the prosecutor.

Soon after, Nielsen asked Elias whether he had trouble understanding English.

"No, but sometimes the words you all use, like, um, I don't really get 'em that much. But I understand English," said Elias, whose family is Puerto Rican.

Restitution hearings are routine and are rarely covered by the press. A reporter for the St. Petersburg Times chanced upon Elias' hearing. His mother later gave a tape recording of the proceeding to the reporter.

Nielsen did not return repeated calls from the Times. Nor did officials at the Hillsborough County Public Defender's Office.

Pinellas-Pasco Public Defender Bob Dillinger said he has never seen a juvenile represent himself during such a hearing.

"That would really bother me," he said, when told that Elias had asked for a lawyer and had said he didn't understand the proceedings. "I would be surprised if our judges (in the Pinellas-Pasco circuit) wouldn't give him a lawyer."

Nielsen, 52, built his reputation in civil litigation with an emphasis on business law. He was head of the litigation department at a Tampa firm, Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, when Gov. Jeb Bush appointed him to the bench in November 2000.

Nielsen graduated from the University of New Mexico and got a law degree from the University of Florida. He had no judicial experience before his appointment. In his application for nomination to the circuit court, Nielsen wrote that certain traits would serve him well on the bench, including honesty, integrity and fairness.

Elias' mother, Evangeline Castillo, had hired a private attorney to hammer out a plea agreement weeks earlier. But she could not afford to retain the lawyer, Tina Dampf, any longer.

She figured her son would be assigned to a public defender for the restitution hearing.

"Mr. Elias, do you have a lawyer representing you in this matter?" Nielsen asked the youth at the beginning of the hearing. He said he did not.

"So, Ms. Dampf is no longer representing you in this matter, is that correct?" Nielsen asked.

Yes, Elias said.

"All right, well we're going to proceed . . . at this time," Nielsen said.

Elias, lanky and wearing a shirt that showed off his abdomen, said nothing. Nearby was a co-defendant represented by Public Defender Elizabeth Beardsley.

At one point during the proceedings, Elias asked whether the prosecutor was representing him.

"No, sir, she's not . . . she is handling that case on behalf of the state," Nielsen said.

"On my behalf?" Elias asked.

"Not on your behalf. Against you, sir. Now, in a moment, you'll get an opportunity to ask questions of the witness."

"I don't know what to say," Elias said.

His mother spoke up. "You want me to say it for you?" she asked her son in English.

"No, if you're going to do anything, you need to tell him what to say," Nielsen told her. "You're not the attorney."

Several attorneys sounded perplexed when told of Elias' travails. George Richards, deputy chief of the juvenile division at the Hillsborough State Attorney's Office, said indigent youths are appointed an attorney unless they specifically decline one.

"A judge has to find that it's a knowing waiver," Richards said. "If the child understands, the parent understands that they're waiving their right, and they say, "No, we don't want an attorney,' then (an attorney) won't be appointed."

Judy Estren, executive assistant public defender at the Pinellas-Pasco Public Defender's Office, said the co-defendant's attorney should have intervened. "I would have instructed my attorney to jump in."

Castillo, 36, was a janitor at the Hillsborough courthouse for years until she was injured a few years ago. She got to the courthouse an hour before the hearing May 6, she said, to line up a public defender. Castillo said a bailiff she knew told her not to worry, that the judge would handle everything.

Nielsen ordered restitution of $4,608.94. Elias, who has dropped out of school, is on probation. He is doing his court-ordered public service at a youth center, Castillo said.

On Monday, Elias said he was still reeling from his day in court.

"They were acting like I was a lawyer and I know how to speak," he said.

"I'm like, dang. The way they speak and the way they put their words, I don't understand


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: az wildkitten
You're welcome. I do expect, when this complaint gets before the Judicial Review Board (or whatever it's called in Florida) that the Board will pull all this judge's cases to see if he's done it before. This is taking judicial expediency to the nth degree, and in the meantime, the judge trampled over the kid's fundamental constitutional rights. What the judge was supposed to do is to first ascertain whether the kid was unrepresented, inquire as to whether he wanted to represent himself; if no, he's supposed to make a referral to the Public Defender's office and the judge reschedules the hearing. If yes, he has to go through an in-depth questioning of the kid on whether the kid has the ability to represent himself. What does surprise me is that judge didn't contact the attorney of record and make him hustle his butt to the courtroom to continue his representation of the kid whether he liked it or not, whether he was paid or not.

There really is no excuse. Despite the judge's relative inexperience on the bench, this is Law School 101, basic Intro to Criminal Law. Not only that, unless Florida is different from most states, after a judge is appointed or elected to the bench, he or she goes to Judge School. And, like any other judge, he has a Judicial Handbook within reach (either on the bench, in his chambers, or in the courthouse law library) to find out what to do in circumstances like this, all neatly indexed.

21 posted on 05/28/2002 6:42:13 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mortin Sult
What make you think that this judge deserves any respect?
22 posted on 05/28/2002 6:43:27 PM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
I'm a little slow tonight.

St. Petersburg Times;...when Gov. Jeb Bush appointed him to the bench in November 2000.

They can't get over the election of 2000 can they.

23 posted on 05/28/2002 6:47:16 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Despite the judge's relative inexperience on the bench,...

Ignorance of the law is an excuse only if you are a judge, prosecutor, police officer or some other person on the government payroll.

24 posted on 05/28/2002 6:50:06 PM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
In this case, I doubt if ignorance of the law is going to be excused. You might want to review my previous post and the judge's mistake #3.
25 posted on 05/28/2002 6:57:52 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
In the words of Harry Callahan: "I'm all broken up about this man's rights."
26 posted on 05/28/2002 6:57:53 PM PDT by mrfixit514
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
The "kid" was convicted of stealing the car in a previous proceding. He had a lawyer then. Obviously he, or his guardian chose not to procure the services of a lawyer for the penalty phase.

Your letter of the law interprtation of events here does not in any way resemble justice IMHO.Justice for whom? The victim or the adjudged guilty perpetrator? There comes a point when even lawyers, must believe they should be the first ones killed, for the continued existance of a rational society, supposedly committed to justice for all, not just the clients of lawyers.

27 posted on 05/28/2002 7:01:09 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
It would be a pleasant surprise if any action against this judge consisted or more than a sharply worded "don't get caught doing it again". His mistake of behaving in this manner with a reporter in the room is the only reason that this is getting any publicity. You're right. That could be his biggest mistake.
28 posted on 05/28/2002 7:09:26 PM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I smell something:

"Restitution hearings are routine and are rarely covered by the press. A reporter for the St. Petersburg Times chanced upon Elias' hearing. His mother later gave a tape recording of the proceeding to the reporter."

Sure you did. Then this:

"...when Gov. Jeb Bush appointed him to the bench in November 2000."

then this is thrown in:

"He had no judicial experience before his appointment."

In 2002, this is the start of a lot of crack investigative journalism. Forget any IJ on a Dim however, only Repubs are ever under scrutiny.

29 posted on 05/28/2002 7:11:23 PM PDT by HighWheeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: Catspaw
"This is taking judicial expediency to the nth degree, and in the meantime, the judge trampled over the kid's fundamental constitutional rights. "

Well I don't know how you arrived at that conclusion. The reporter seems to intentionally left out of the report any pertinent information to back your mere conjecture. The parts left out of any report slamming a Repub will always be the most interesting.

31 posted on 05/28/2002 7:15:48 PM PDT by HighWheeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
"I'm like, dang. The way they speak and the way they put their words, I don't understand

Oyea, estupido! Tu ozo mucho donero! $4,608.94

32 posted on 05/28/2002 7:17:03 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
"I'm like, dang. The way they speak and the way they put their words, I don't understand

More like;

"I'm like, dang.I {more likely my momma} actually have to pay for my actions,dang.

33 posted on 05/28/2002 7:17:24 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: marshmallow
This verdict or whatever it is will be bounced in a hurry.
35 posted on 05/28/2002 7:20:21 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: ambrose
Awww... our public edukayshin system at work...

Read the article. The kid dropped out of school.

37 posted on 05/28/2002 7:23:05 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: Mortin Sult
There are restaurants you can't get into with a shirt.

There are some you can't get into without a shirt. So what?

We're discussing due process in a court of law, not access to private property.

39 posted on 05/28/2002 7:26:49 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
No, calamari!!
40 posted on 05/28/2002 7:33:25 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson