No, but my memory of the quote is flawed as to context.
The passage is from "From Lexington to Liberty" by Bruce Lancaster, Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1955.
It may be mentioned here that the long-cherished
"African triangle" - that is, New England ships
bringing molasses from the West Indies to be made
into rum to be carried to Africa for the purchase of
slaves to be sold in the West India market for more
molasses to be made into more rum to purchase more
slaves, etc. - seems to belong to legend. Recent
studies made by Charles H. P. Copeland of the Peabody
Museum of Salem show that the Massachusetts slave
trade averaged less than one ship a year over a
period of more than a century prior to the Revolution.
I am by no means an expert in the history of the slave trade, but what I have read would indicate that there would not have been a tremendous market for slaves in New England and little incentive to deliver them there for transport elsewhere.
My own understanding is:
Great Britain has: manufactured goods needs: rum,sugar,wood,tobacco,cotton New England has: rum, wood needs: sugar, manufactured goods the Old South has: tobacco,cotton needs: slaves,manufactured goods West Indies has: tobacco, sugar needs: slaves,manufactured goods Africa has: slaves(people) needs: rum, manufactured goods,tobacco
The "triangle" which I see involving New England is:
Take rum and (imported) manufactured goods to Africa Take slaves to West Indies Take sugar to New EnglandThe reliance on sugar imported from the West Indies which is being cultivated by slaves certainly creates a dependence in New England on the slave trade.
Now that I have done this exercise, it would seem that the author's claim is ambiguous. Much depends on what he classifies as "the slave trade" in New England. The issue should be whether the ship routinely carries slaves, not whether the ship delivers slaves to New England.
Perhaps some Freeper with access to the Peabody Museum of Salem can research this detail further.