[Bump in the night]

You want to change the definition because you think it is okay to discard human life if it happens to get in the way of free sex.

I keep seeing this "free sex" thing on this thread. I'm lost. What does "free sex" have to do with abortion? Not everyone that receives an abortion got pregnant by having wild orgies and unprotected sex with multiple unknown partners. I know someone that got pregnant who had been married for years, didn't want children, used a condom and spermicide and got pregnant anyway. Wild "free sex" people, as you call them, are not the only ones who need or get abortions.

[JMJ333]

Free sex is where the majority of abortions originate. People want to be able to have sex without any consequences, hence the need for contraception. Contraception fails and so then an innocent and defenseless life is needlessly and violently killed--out of selfishness and the shirking of responsibility.

There is onlt several days out of the month in which a woman is fertile. Abstain from the time a woman is fertile and prevent an unwanted pregnancy. That is what I am arguing for--the waste of life caused by selfish abhorrent behavior---that...and to beg for mercy on those who don't deem worthy of life because they have only been in existance a few weeks.

[ArGee]

Wild "free sex" people, as you call them, are not the only ones who need or get abortions.

Nobody needs an abortion except the woman whose life is in imminent danger of ending because of the child in her womb. That situation is rare. Other women want an abortion, but they don't need one.

Shalom.