Excerpt from "Abortion-Breast Cancer Lawsuit Goes to Trial":" It is widely held among physicians and scientists acknowledging an abortion-breast cancer link that 26 out of 32 published studies on the subject worldwide and 12 out of 13 studies in the United States support the notion.
Contrary to your uninformed claim, the abortion-breast cancer link has the science on its side so far, though the issue is far from settled.
Unfortunately, in this age of PC science, where the conclusion is too often pre-ordained and the evidence is gathered/altered to fit the pre-ordained conclusion, I have to question anything coming out of Denmark without a great deal of further review, especially considering the following comments on the study from a California doctor (April 9, 2002):
This study was so full of holes that reputable medical journals are reluctant to run it any more, without some kind of a disclaimer. Dr. Joel Brind the author of the only comprehensive review and meta-analysis of scientificstudies concerning the link between induced abortion and breast cancer risk exposed the many flaws in it. When the flaws were removed, the study did show that abortions do increase the risk of breast cancer. When he shredded the Danish study to pieces, he pointed out the specific flaws. He showed where the math did not add up. He showed what was left
What an inane claim. Periodicals only published studies once.