You really get SNIPPY when the world does not stand in awe of your brilliance and analytical powers don't you? I have asked you twice now, is it your contention that George W Bush has committed impeachable or even criminal offences in regard to 911? Either you have stones to lay it out in public or you are nothing more than a gossiping old woman.
"...is it your contention George W Bush has committed impeachable or even criminal offences in regard to 911? "
Answer- I do not know yet, maybe Congress Intelligence hearings can find out. They are asking questions about what Bush knew , when he knew it and what he did about it.
It may turn out that Bush used bad judgement and made bad decisions. Even brilliant men who run for President and even win make big mistakes. Question about Bush though is also what were his motives if he did make a mistake? I would like to find out more to decide whether or not I will vote for him again if he should ever run.
THe question about impeachable offenses with respect to Congress and Bush would be irrelevant because COngress would not even remove Clinton from office when he should have been removed.
Poster of reply #90 went on to write:
"Either you have stones to lay it out in public or you are nothing more than a gossiping old woman."
It seems to me that the poster of reply #90 gets frustrated when he does not get the results he wants. And he still does not seem to understand that good questions can be raised be informed citizens on FreeRepublic and even by COngress Intell hearings without the COngressmen and the citizens being thought of as "gossiping old women." When the poster of reply #90 failed with his conspiracies label, he then resulted to the futile "gossiping old women" label.
FBI agents Coleen Rowley and Ken Willaims are not "gossiping old women" either and they got the attention of Congress by raising good questions didn't they?!