Replies

"Why is this so sensitive, and why now?"

It's not sensitive. That's the point.

It was bullshit then, and it's bullshit now.

I'm just trying to point out how unreliable OKCSubmariner is with his sources.

This is the same guy who accused Representative Ernest Istook of "assaulting" his wife and daughter,and has called Senator James Inhofe a "traitor."

You guys ought to stay on your meds.

*The first World Trade Center bombing was on February 26, 1993, one month into the Clinton Administration. The terrorists - Egyptians and Palestinians -- blew a hole six stories deep beneath the North Tower intending to topple it onto the South Tower and kill 250,000 people. It was - in the words of the definitive account - "the most ambitious terrorist attack ever attempted, anywhere, ever." Clinton did nothing. He did not even visit the site. Worse, he allowed the attack to be categorized as a criminal act by individuals, even though its mastermind - as the administration soon discovered -- was an Iraqi intelligence agent named Ramzi Youssef.

It's true that Hersch didn't mention the name Clinton once in his article, but I don't discount everything out of hand for that reason.

This quote from reply #40 is an absolute falsehood and I believe the author of reply #40 knows it is a falsehood:

"This is the same guy who accused Representative Ernest Istook of "assaulting" his wife ..."

The author of reply #40 is desperately out of control in my opinion.