[rdavis84]

"Sources that won't go on record are worthless, aren't they?"

That's about the epitome of guts. The government and the DNC and the RNC are the Worst users of the World Famous "un-named sources" to cover their butts or plant a story that there are in the world.

Here's part of a reply I made to one of your cohorts on another thread yesterday that also suits you here. You're all reading from the same playbook anyway ----

"You seem to take the standpoint that anything at anybody's site that has viewpoints other than the RNC's should be written by Lawyers. That isn't going to happen. This isn't a Courtroom, and the best advice you should follow is "Get Over It".

The level of "irate" about this info/viewpoint brings to mind the questions "Why is this so sensitive, and why now?", to me."

[sinkspur]

No named sources, davis. You can obfuscate all you want, but the Brit tabloid press quoting "unnamed sources" is worse than worthless.