No,there are a few of us,but we are definitely outnumbered by the "Condit was unfaithful to his wife,so he MUST be guilty of murder!" crowd. What it really amounts to is that most of these people want to see "cheating husbands" put in jail for life,and jump on any excuse they can find to justify it.
Hey, sneakypete..if most of us thought that cheating on their wives or husbands was tantamount to going to jail for life...there would be nobody left...
Truth is, Chandra was tightening the screws on Condit...she wanted to marry him....only problem, he already is married with grown children...he had motive, opportunity and the connections to carry this out...
Puleeezzzeeee, to go to jail for life for cheating is a ridiculous thought, unless you murder someone in the process....
" Seducing their daughter " ? Hey , she was 24 , not 12 ! She knew what she was doing .
That's not the reason we think he did it. He had motive and opportunity. He had a 2 1/2 hour gap in his whereabouts at the time of Chandra's disappearance. He has been continually evasive about everything he knows connected to her, and he has changed his story about certain aspects. He initially pretended to help her parents in trying to find her, but he dragged his feet and in actuality refused to help by telling what he knew. He disposed of evidence in a bizarre and furtive manner. He tried to get the woman in this article to lie about their relationship. He has never taken an objective lie detector test. He made a complete, defensive fool of himself in the interview with C. Chung, and she even failed to ask several of the harder questions she could have asked (such as "Where is the WATCH?" after asking him about disposing of the watchbox--she never asked that one).
Chandra was exceptionally security concious due to her background connections with law enforcement. Serial killers get the naive and the unwary for victims. Chandra was neither. Chandra did not take her cell phone on her trip to RC Park despite being demonstrably very eager to hear from Condit.
I could go on and on, but my belief that "Condidit" is NOT based on his unfaithfulness to his wife.
What a pathetic take on people who stood up to the obvious obstruction and deceit this man engaged in when dealing with the family of Chandra, his fellow Congresspersons and police following her disappearance. I don't care about anyone's personal life, nor does anyone I know; we do care that witnesses (at the least) who have useful information in a now murder investigation, be candid and forthright with the investigators. For the record, Condit appears to have taken the fifth in front of the grand jury, and repeatedly lied to the police and the family and the public. So go stuff your accusations of hidden agendas in a trash bin out in the country somewhere.
You are so wrong, it's pathetic. How convenient for you to gloss over everything we know about this wretched man. You obviously know nothing about this case and have an agenda all your own.
"No,there are a few of us,but we are definitely outnumbered by the "Condit was unfaithful to his wife,so he MUST be guilty of murder!" crowd. What it really amounts to is that most of these people want to see "cheating husbands" put in jail for life,and jump on any excuse they can find to justify it."
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Sneaky,...me thinks you've been drinking from the sheeple pond on this one. Condit didn't get the moniker ''Scary Conduct''..because he cheats on his wife & family. There's plenty of reported suspicious action by Scary..totally unrelated to the "unfaithful" issue.
FWIW-
What it amounts to is most often it is the person closest to the victem. Condit had motive, opportunity and NO alibi. He was not honest with the police. He is SUSPECT NUMERO UNO! PERIOD!