Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia opens military supply line for India
Hindustantimes ^ | 5/26/02 | Saurabh Shukla

Posted on 05/26/2002 3:37:07 PM PDT by Ranger

India's declaration of a 'decisive response' to Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism has received a big boost from its strategic partner, Russia.

Though Russian President Vladimir Putin is advocating restraint and has also offered to broker peace, Russia has reportedly begun supplying emergency military hardware to New Delhi to meet the Pakistan challenge.

Back-channel diplomacy has also resulted in Moscow extending 'logisitical support', including intelligence on PoK terror camps to Indian security agencies.

Significantly, Moscow has indicated to New Delhi that if the need arises, it will exercise its 'veto' in India's favour at the UN Security Council. During the 1971 war, the then Soviet Union had similarly acted on four occasions to prevent India from being declared the 'aggressor.'

Sources disclosed that Russia has already diverted emergency military hardware from the stocks of its Red Army. These include spares for MiG aircraft, artillery systems and other defence equipment to meet India's emergency war requirements. “To meet India's needs, we have waived off some regulations to reach material on a priority basis,” said a diplomatic source.

While agreeing to militarily back India under the 1993 Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation, the Putin administration hasn't evidently given up the diplomatic option. Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov had earlier this week spoken to External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh and assured him of his country's full support.

“We have told India that war should be avoided but in case Pakistan does not respond to India's demands and a military operation happens, Moscow will play its role as New Delhi's strategic partner,” the source added.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: india; russia; southasialist

1 posted on 05/26/2002 3:37:07 PM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ranger
I bet that Putin and Bush discussed this and Bush approves. Officially, Bush is working with Pakistan, but he doesn't like to be made a fool of, and Musharraf is definitely walking the line in his relations to India and his support of ISI sponsored terrorists.
2 posted on 05/26/2002 3:49:38 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Has there ever been a surrogate war between China and Russia ? Such would occur here with the Chinese supplying the Pakistanis and the Russians supplying the Indians. I don't know whether the Khmer Rouge would have been a Chinese surrogate at the time Cambodia was invaded by Vietnam.
3 posted on 05/26/2002 4:29:40 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *southasia_list
*Index Bump
4 posted on 05/26/2002 4:42:36 PM PDT by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Didn't China and Russia (Soviet Union) in the 1960s have some limited skirmishes along the northern Chinese border near Mongolia?

Also China and Vietnam rumbled a little in the late 1970s, didn't they?

Does this count? :)
5 posted on 05/26/2002 4:42:55 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Sure there was the head to head stuff along the Amur River, and the Chinese clashes with the Vietnamese. I was just thinking about all of the Cold War fights between US surrogates and USSR surrogates, and wondered if there was a new paradigm at work.
6 posted on 05/26/2002 4:59:41 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Re surrogate war between Russia and China:

I can't recall one. When they presented a unified Communist front, they mostly co-operated. Another poster mentioned that Cambodia had Chinese backing when Vietnam invaded it, but that was mostly an after-the-fact sideshow. I think this would be a first. Maybe it would be significant. I've posted before that the Russians ought to ally with us--we have no desire to take over Siberia to relieve our population pressure. We'd happily pay for resources.

Historically, Russia was over-run by the Mongols before. Politics aside, I don't think they've completely forgotten. At least, I hope not.

7 posted on 05/26/2002 6:12:18 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
I think your right. I wouldn't be surprised if we aren't providing India with satellite imagery as well.
8 posted on 05/26/2002 6:54:22 PM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
"Sure there was the head to head stuff along the Amur River,"

I think the Chinese-Soviet clashes were in 1967, specifically between Chinese troops and KGB border guards.

9 posted on 05/26/2002 6:57:53 PM PDT by newwahoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
China is the wild card. America chastises Pakistan, Russia announces for India. If China comes in this could get out of hand.
10 posted on 05/26/2002 7:02:09 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Section9, seamole, southack
ping
11 posted on 05/26/2002 8:34:54 PM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson