If you can't stand on your own convictions - then you're not very convinced of them. I believe what I believe and if you don't agree - oh well!! My convictions are not based on whether or not you agree with me.
You think Bush is avoiding prosecuting the Clintons. I'm not convinced of that. So, we don't agree! So! Why are you trying to make a federal case out of the fact I don't agree with you?? You're entitled to your opinion, I just don't agree with you.
However, your actions are much more liberal than mine - because liberals are much more pushy and require that others think like they do or they start calling names. Being a conservative, I think for myself. If I don't agree with you, I don't make a federal case out of it, and I don't require you to believe as I do.
And ... I'm not accusing you of having any ulterior motive just because you don't agree with me - like "being a move-on" type of person. Personally, I don't care what you think.
No. I'm upset because you have nothing to counter the two arguments I made so you are ACTING just like a democRAT. It is sad that so many Republicans are now putting party over principle just like the democRATS did. Question ... what will you do when you finally realize that nothing is being done to even investigate ANY of the crimes the democRATS committed? What excuse or rationalization will you use then?
If you can't stand on your own convictions - then you're not very convinced of them. I believe what I believe and if you don't agree - oh well!!
But what if those beliefs are counter to the facts? That is the complaint we had about many democRATS ... they based their opinions on BELIEF and not facts. Sounds to me like some Republicans are now doing that too. What will you do when you finally realize that nothing was ever being investigated? Will you just say "Oh well" and move along too? If so, then you are no different than the democRATS we all claim to despise.
You think Bush is avoiding prosecuting the Clintons. I'm not convinced of that. So, we don't agree!
But I give you facts that support my opinion. All you have is belief ... just like the democRATS.
You're entitled to your opinion, I just don't agree with you.
How does it feel to be on the receiving end of what we've done to democRATS for so many years. Because they can't argue the facts, they RUN. That's why we own talk radio. That's why we will own forums like this. Or at least those who are willing to discuss and debate the facts will own it. If Republican's begin acting like democRATS I expect they'll end up having to do just what democRATS do ... RUN. That won't go over very well with the many lurkers who stop by to read the threads on this forum. Think about the implications of that come election time.
However, your actions are much more liberal than mine - because liberals are much more pushy and require that others think like they do or they start calling names.
Garbage. The only accusation I've made is to suggest you are behaving like a democRAT ... because you demonstrably are. I don't require that you think like me but I do require that you back up your arguments with facts if you intend to win or draw a debate with me. If you can't, I will point that out to those reading this.
If I don't agree with you, I don't make a federal case out of it, and I don't require you to believe as I do.
My we are getting defensive. As I said, it doesn't feel very good to be called to task for arguing like a democRAT, does it. THAT is why Bush and the GOP need to deal with the crimes the democRATS committed and not move-on as appears to be the case. Then you won't have to defend the indefensible.
And ... I'm not accusing you of having any ulterior motive just because you don't agree with me - like "being a move-on" type of person.
But it is quite logical to suggest that if people are willing to ignore crimes as serious as murder and mass murder, and base that ONLY on belief that their party wouldn't do such a thing, then they are either democRATS trying to keep those matters from being investigated or Republicans who for wrong reasons don't want the pot stirred either. There has to be a reason and I don't for one moment believe it is because you are ignorant. You clearly are not so why do you put so much "faith" in one man after we've seen such men disappoint us time and time again?
Personally, I don't care what you think.
But you do care what those reading this discussion think ... or you wouldn't concern yourself with my observation ... and you know that by not addressing the facts you do indeed come across as debating like a democRAT.