At the time, there was a Sandra or Sandy Lucas who owned or rented an apartment in Luray, VA. The apartment backed up to Evergreen Cemetary and was about 1/4 mile from McDonald's. Could this be the CA staff, Sandra Lucas? Was it a Gary Condit hideaway?
4-30-01 - Chandra left the gym at 8:30 p.m. - wearing what? Does the clothing match the clothing found?
5-1-01 - 4:15 a.m. - Screams outside her apartment building.
5-17-01 - Condit is in Luray, on the phone with AMS. Condit has a connection to a storage company in Luray.
Shifting gears, if Carolyn had been at a luncheon with the First Lady, there would have been press reports/photos. Has this been verified? Thanks ...
Pegita
Check the dates - some are wrong (2001 when they should be 2000, one or two say 2001 when they should be 2002). Not a biggie, but just want to enhance the accuracy.
Do you have a source for the claim that Chandra wore a man's Tag Hauer? That would be huge, if true, but I don't recall that coming out.
Okay, we won't tell you what we are on to YET. But, in the statement above, are you sure it has been revealed to Aunt Linda that Condit is "Her Man"?
Again, are we sure Aunt Linda knows Chandra is staying with CONDIT?
Levy went to Condit's apartment to explain that her internship had abruptly ended and to seek his assistance. She was upset. April 24, 2001: Condit said he last spoke to Chandra on this date. He could not recall whether they had sex.
She shows up at Condit's apt. on the 23rd. On the 24th Condit speaks with Chandra but can't remember if they had sex. She spent the night? He can't remember if he had sex with Chandra the last time he saw her alive but he can remember that she was "upset". April 25, 2001: Levy attended her going-away luncheon at the Hyatt Hotel in Washington.
More recently, in January 2001, about four months before Levy disappeared, Sue Wen Stottmeister, a 48-year-old preschool teacher from Aspen Hill, was jogging in the park in Montgomery County when she was dragged into the woods, sexually assaulted and killed.
I'm searching for more info on this to see what I can find, and just where in Rock Creek Park (Montgomery County) this took place.
And another small correction, but this has been bothering me all week.... Chandra was NOT looking up the Klingel Mansion in Rock Creek Park on her computer - she was looking up directions for the park, and the Klingel Mansion came up on the home page. This was said two times during the day that Chandra's body was found, by the chief of police who was on tv all day giving reports. Twice I heard him correct a news person who said this and he said "It was the park, and the mansion just happens to come up on the home page".
Karrie
Assuming for the moment that Condit wasn't sincerely trying to be helpful, what was the reason or motive for the unapproved lie detector test? To hinder or obstruct the investigation? If he is innocent it is all the more reason to take an approved lie-detector test rather than the unapproved test that would bring additional scrutiny and doubt about his innocence.
BTW, I'm not totally up to speed on this case but I read on another thread wherein one poster said that the skull was separated from the rest of the skeleton. As I understand it they matched the skull's teeth with Chandra's dental records. So it has been proven that the skull is Chandra's. What about the skeleton? That said, a DNA test on the skeleton needs to be compared to Chandra's DNA.
A few comments:
The dates Nov. 23, 2001 and Dec. 13, 2001 should be in 2000, I believe.
When I enter "rock creek park" in Google, nothing comes up about the Klingel Mansion. I wonder what the "home page" is that the police are talking about (see Post #27)?