Replies

I expect we will find that agent Rowley is a liberal. The first indications will be how she is profiled by the likes of Dan Rather. If she is not treated like Linda Tripp we have a pretty clear preliminary indication that she has a political agenda.

The great turf war for the cure of systemic failure in the intelligence establishment has started. The left wants an independent commission for a reason. At first, I thought they wanted it because it would provide a vehicle to bash Bush but now I think they see it as a vehicle for the overhaul of the FBI and the Department of Justice by extension.

There is no question that the war against terrorism will result in more intrusive Federal law enforcement and intelligence apparatus. It is imperative that the left does shape the new order to its liking.

If she is not treated like Linda Tripp we have a pretty clear preliminary indication that she has a political agenda.

So her 'agenda' is determined by how others treat her?

Post hoc ergo propter hoc

I expect we will find that agent Rowley is a liberal.

Who cares? She (and they) were one of the few (apparently) agents in the FBI who were realistic in suspecting Arab muslims of being up to no good in the U.S. They didn't give in to PC (religion of peace) and investigated with common sense. I don't care if she's a marxist/liberal/homosexual/atheist/hedonist. She was doing her job, and unless you think Ashcroft's prosecution is a farce, she was right.