Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nita Nupress;Mrs Maher;MiMibru
I keep asking the same question to those who believe Monaco and the liberal press.
Why, if the case against Ted is so clear cut, is no trial date set after 2 1/2 years?
But as you can see some poster just read this BS aricle which is slanted by the media,
And some have just read the BS from the Time Magazine article (with sources from the NY Times) in post 141.
I'm still waiting for one of them to answer the qustion "Why no trial set after 2 1/2 years?"
327 posted on 05/27/2002 10:02:31 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]


To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
I answered your question. Go back to 265.
328 posted on 05/27/2002 10:25:16 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Do you think I know the answer? All I Know, Is they don't have to put him on trial for 4 years if they chose.This law was passed after he was put in jail. Tammy
329 posted on 05/27/2002 10:31:16 AM PDT by MiMibru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson