The case is not so certain against this man, in regards to the charge of Arson. They obviously have a case against him for setting the fire and causing a dangerous situation.
That is Monaco's problem....and even though they have laws and punishments for negligent homicide or manslaughter, in my opinion, the officials in Monaco do not feel that convicting him of this is adequate for the two reasons, revenge and appearances/responsibilities. The judges obviously have personal conflicts of interest, and there is money (from benefit of Safra's death and from tourism/other ultra-rich residents) involved here.
This explains alot of the missing documents and disconnects in the evidence that have been avaialble to us.
The disconnect on this board is that people are claiming the original story about the killers, and not that Ted had caused an 'accident'. The court tv article is even saying that Heidi Maher has is not denying Ted's confession. This is why I asked Mrs. Maher what I asked, because I do not have to depend on Court Tv for this information. We have her here in this forum.
"Maher has dropped his claim that he was attacked by intruders but his lawyers and wife say that without evidence he intended to harm Safra or Torrente, the more serious charge is neither appropriate nor legal."
It appears Ted has committed a crime. Ted needs due process. He has been denied that.
This is what appears to be at odds in this forum. The free Ted threads then do him a disservice by not recognizing this, and it makes readers question the motives of the posts and the website.