I haven't, other than reading the initial Maher posts, and this latest article.
I suspect you'll overpower me with hearsay and innuendo. I don't know enough about this to argue with you.
So, I'll wait until the trial and see what happens.
And I'm not interested in "arguing." I don't know for sure if this man is guilty or not. All I know is he's not being allowed to present evidence that appears to exonerate him.
You know, if you would take the time to actually read the facts about things before reaching your conclusions, you'd probably find your entire viewpoint of life would change about a lot of things.
As far as this case goes, you would realize that you couldn't be overpowered by hearsay and innuendo. You would be overpowered with all the unanswered questions that Monaco is hiding.