Posted on 05/23/2002 7:54:41 PM PDT by Jalapeno
I will not address her because of the sensitivity of the situation - please do it for me (good to see you again).
I have seen title after title of post on FR that says "Free Ted Maher." What the heck kind of twisted psycho wants Ted Maher freed??????????????!!!!!!!!!! I don't know what kind of conservative would want that. Such people are a disgrace to FR and should be banned for supporting a KILLER.
You're a sweetheart. :-)
[..sigh..] I would say Court TV was very effective with their article.
Would you please read the entire thread and then comment?
Stop embarrassing yourself. It's very unpleasant to watch.
The more I come back to this thread and follow the posts, the more I find that I can't help juxtaposing the whole thing with the Mumia "cause celeb". The similarity in the psychology of the excusers / conspiracy theorists is eerie.
I am an avid tin-foiler myself, but even I can't follow this one.
(I know, I know - - then why hasn't Monaco tried Maher? That question is something apart from all the conflicting reports about what happened and why.)
Tell me about the diarrhea. Or about the perfumed candles. Or about why the police department was called, but couldn't come, so some way was concocted to get the fire department on scene.
I'm really trying to understand what Mrs. Maher is getting at.
It does strain credulity.
But, maybe if we can understand the constant diarrhea, we can begin to flush out the truth.
It appears there is more to this story than what the original article makes it appear.
The first thing I noticed about the picture when the thread started was the very dilated pupils. The flash from the camera must have blinded Ted for a couple of minutes.
But you are right - - stretching that picture was as low a blow as the darkening of OJ's picture on the cover of Newsweak (or Time, whatever). It is all indicative of a complete lack of journalistic integrity.
Fire in the trash can. That's my confusion. Or did Ted put a perfumed candle in the trash can to draw attention to the intruder?
Oh, he's not confused, believe me.
I think you have a lot of catching up to do.
Ted now admits there were no intruders.
Unless he was tortured into saying there were no intruders.
Now do you see?
That's your response? I'm responding to Mrs. Maher, who brought up the diarrhea, and the candles (which, I surmise, must be Ted's defense).
OK. I'll just go elsewhere, unconvinced of Ted Maher's innocence.
Love ya, Nita, but this is bizarro.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.