NO. All you have to do is explain why an officer of the court would knowingly allow the Clinton Whitehouse to keep the FBI files (which that officer told us publically were illegal for the Whitehouse to have) for YEARS after the Whitehouse and FBI publically stated that the files had been returned. These are not "theories". Both are FACTS.
It is also a fact that Starr was the #2 name on Clinton's list. Do you want to tell us that you think Clinton would have put as the 2nd name on that list someone who they thought would actually investigate ... given the many illegalities that we all know they committed? Or don't you think there were illegalities?
They simply can't be persuaded.
I can be persuaded by facts. Do you have any to offer?
Ken Starr is a good guy and a Republican on the planet that I live on.
Then explain why he allowed an illegality as significant as gathering blackmail information on Republicans to continue even after the Whitehouse told us the files were returned? Explain why few of the major figures in Filegate were ever questioned by Starr ... or why the few that were questioned were never asked the right questions. If you don't believe me ... then believe Tripp, because that is what she said about Starr's "investigation" of Filegate.
Hope you're enjoying the weather on your planet.
Sure. Just RUN from the debate once FACTS actually get mentioned. You see, that is what ALL the move-on'ers on this thread do anytime the crimes of the Clinton's and their associates get discussed. Isn't it curious that those who are most vocal attacking Klayman are also the same ones who want us to just move-on where those crimes are concerned. How about you? You satisfied with the investigation into Filegate, or Chinagate, or the deaths of Foster and Brown?