This is the part where I suppose I should add that I'm not a big fan of us eating our own, that Klayman has done *some* good, that there's not much to be gained from publicly criticizing the tactis of another conservative unless you think they are destructive. I am pretty new at this, and I dont know alot about Klayman. I know he was all over Clinton a few years ago. But I dont think the Seirra Klub is conservative. If their on the same side as the Seirra Klub, are they really conservatives?
It's a marriage of convenience. I think the Sierra Club is looking to take advantage of Klayman's huge postage discount.