Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jayef
'This would create the proper competitive pressures that would benefit the consumer.'

Only in terms of customer service and pricing. I don't see how it would increase the availability of new plant or options.

The plan being proposed, from my view, doesn't solve much but introduces more problems.

BTW, do you work for a Telcomm? You seem to know the lingo.

30 posted on 05/28/2002 1:40:22 PM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Bogey78O
Yes, I work at a CLEC based in South Carolina. That should narrow it down for you quite a bit.

I think that Bell would be forced to behave more as a supplier if it didn't have the support of its retail arm. I think that Bell would be forced into network wide upgrades to meet the needs of Bell retail and other customers. If everyone had the same access to the plant and it was provided as a commodity, there would be no incentive to provide disparate quality to any particular consumer. This is exaclty what the current regime encourages.

Remove that piece from the equation and introduce some wholesale competition and the consumer will benefit. The ILECs are upgrading plant now, not because of the demands of it's customers (both wholesale and retail), but because it is more efficient and ultimately cheaper for them to do so.

That pressure would be partly removed under the "Broadband Deregulation" proposals that regress from the 1996 Act. I have no doubt that the consumer would ultimately suffer. All the ILEC has offered the consumer in return is long distance. Long distance!

35 posted on 05/28/2002 2:05:50 PM PDT by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson