Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Twodees
Since there is no prohibition against secession anywhere in any article or any amendment, then secession is a reserved state power, and a right reserved to the people of the states.

Gee. I wonder why James Madison didn't see that? Maybe he was just another 'damnyankee'.

669 posted on 05/29/2002 12:52:20 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
Madison was aware of what the 10th amendment provided. The fact that he wrote letters in his dotage in which he claimed that what he intended to include in the Constitution was much more than the text contained is beside the point. The states ratified the Constitution as written. Madison's subsequent letters seem to have failed ratification.

You may read the 10th amendment's plain English and translate it into Martian if you like, but it still reads exactly as it did when it was ratified. The meaning hasn't changed any more than the meaning of the 2nd amendment has changed.

679 posted on 05/29/2002 6:15:18 PM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson