Not so, and already shown to be Not So by 4CJ. You have been confuted, and yet you continue to post defective arguments. Sore loser. We are constantly bombarded with this nit-picky unreasonable/belittle the framers neo-reb rant.
Argument ad hominem and ad populum. Both fallacies. Thank you for the demonstration. Although I'm sure you didn't realize it.
Where is similar verbiage from the actual participants?
Try Davis's inaugural speech. It's a good one.
By the way, YOU can pass soevereign acts too. If you can back them up with force -- which the so-called CSA could not.
Ah -- appeal to force. The trifecta! I'm almost as chuffed as N-S about his 1000th post -- thanks, Walt, you've given a real clinic this morning on being a sore loser and stupid and malevolent to boot.
Not so, and already shown to be Not So by 4CJ.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly said otherwise.
If the secesh had been honorable, they would acted honorably -- through the courts.
Walt
Nope.
I am a union man. I am a winner.
It's the neo-rebs who are the losers, just like their heroes.
Of course as I like to say; if you are alive, you won the Civil War.
Walt
Try Davis's inaugural speech. It's a good one.
Apparently it's not worth quoting.
Walt