Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shuckmaster
Your answer makes no sense. How could the southerners avoid tariffs by importing the goods through southern ports? Tariffs were uniform and applied to goods imported regardless of the point of entry. The fact that so little tariff income was collected in southern ports is evidence that your claims are wrong.
59 posted on 05/22/2002 9:57:04 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
You are missing the economic point of tariffs, and perhaps intentionally so.

Tariffs are instituted primarily for economic protectionism. Funds raised from them are a significantly distinct and secondary function of them. There is no disputing the fact that the north advocated protectionism by tariffs, and in many cases got it.

The south on the other hand, as expressed repeatedly in pre-war editorials and by two of the four states that wrote declarations of causes for the war, was against protectionism because it ruined crop prices on the international trade.

66 posted on 05/22/2002 4:41:36 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson