Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DallasMike
Look up what I said in any good history book or check it out on the web.

Here's a good history book for you. "Lifeline of the Confederacy: Blockade Running During the Civil War" by Stephen Wise. In it he gives a table that showed over 95% of all tariff income was collected in three Northern ports - New York, Boston, and Philadelphia. How could tariffs be such a bone of contention when the overwhelming majority of them were paid by northerners?

41 posted on 05/22/2002 4:35:28 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
95% of all tariff income was collected in three Northern ports

If that number is true (of which I am sketical), I think it makes sense - the North set up tariffs to spur industrialism. The South is exporting agricultural goods, cotton, tobacco, etc. to the North and Europe. Tariffs and land sales were the federal governments two sources of income. Land sales were down from settlers/homestead acts out west, so tariffs are bumped.

46 posted on 05/22/2002 6:39:49 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson