Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
"My study of the historical events that culminated in the Fourteenth Amendment, and the expressions of those who sponsored and favored, as well as those who opposed its submission and passage, persuades me that one of the chief objects that the provisions of the Amendment's first section, separately, and as a whole, were intended to accomplish was to make the Bill of Rights, applicable to the states."

And that still leaves me with my question: why, then, didn't these framers simply come right out and say it in the amendment itself? It wouldn't have been very difficult for them to do. Why all the beating around the bush?

6 posted on 05/22/2002 5:46:05 PM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
IMO, they didn't 'beat around the bush'. - And it's fairly simple language, for its day. - Justice Black agrees, & makes a very understandable statement to that effect.

I would bet your problem with the 14th is what it says, -- more than how its said. - True?

7 posted on 05/22/2002 6:12:32 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: inquest
They did say it, and Blacks paragraph explains why.

- If you don't believe Black, read the ratification debates themselves. They're on the web.

10 posted on 05/22/2002 8:06:40 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson