Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
Reread Blacks explanation. -- The 14th was based on overturning the Barron decision.

I read each time you posted it. It doesn't change anything. And I replied to it in #21, to which you haven't responded, except by posting the actual text of the amendment, which I dissected for you. Do you want to keep going around in circles like this, or do you want to address any of the actual points I raised?

31 posted on 05/23/2002 9:34:15 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
Reread Blacks explanation. -- The 14th was based on overturning the Barron decision.

I read each time you posted it. It doesn't change anything.

I can't help you to understand Blacks clear reasoning.

And I replied to it in #21, to which you haven't responded, except by posting the actual text of the amendment, which I dissected for you.

I responded at #23 with two paragraphs beyond the 'text'. - Which you replied to, but now ignore. - Weird claim .

Do you want to keep going around in circles like this, or do you want to address any of the actual points I raised?

I have addressed every actual point you raised, despite your denials. - So unless you will admit that fact, & move on, this exchange is at an end.

34 posted on 05/23/2002 11:17:48 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson