Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
It is a rational continuum which, broadly speaking, includes a freedom from all substantial arbitrary impositions and purposeless restraints, . . . and which also recognizes, what a reasonable and sensitive judgment must, that certain interests require particularly careful scrutiny of the state needs asserted to justify their abridgment.

Purposeless restraints. Excellent key concept!

Thanks.

121 posted on 05/30/2002 8:50:32 AM PDT by Bobsat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Bobsat
It's also one of the key pretexts for usurpation of federal power. This way, courts get to demand that states justify all of their laws as fulfilling some legitimate need, and if the courts don't accept your justification, too bad. Alexander Hamilton thought the country's name should be the United State of America. Nowadays, that would certainly seem to be truth in advertising.
122 posted on 05/30/2002 9:23:53 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: Bobsat
Purposeless restraints. Excellent key concept! Thanks.

------------------------------

Exactly. - I found that quote while trying to establish that the 14ths 'due process', in effect, - re-enforces the concept that prohibitive law on all types of property is unconstitutional without amendment.

It stands to reason that if the state cannot deprive a person of "-property, without due process-" that prohibitions on certain types of essentially harmless guns, drugs, pictures, etc, -- are 'purposeless restraints'.

124 posted on 05/30/2002 10:30:55 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson