Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ned
Then you agree.
-- "The historical facts remain, - the 14th was not intended as a federal power grab." --
102 posted on 05/29/2002 11:00:29 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
The historical facts remain, - the 14th was not intended as a federal power grab." --

I don't think of any provision in the Constitution in terms of being a "federal power grab," but these Civil War amendments did provide the Congress with some very substantial new powers.

Consider, for example, the Fifteenth Amendment. Section 1 of that amendment prohibits any state from discriminating against people "on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." Section 2 empowers Congress to enforce the amendment by appropriate legislation. In Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections (1959), the Supreme Court upheld state literacy tests when it was contended that they were unconstitutional pursuant to Section 1 of the Fifteenth Amendment. Thereafter, Congress determined in the course of legislative hearings that some states were utilizing literacy tests for the purpose of depriving blacks of the right to vote. Based upon its findings, Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965 which barred certain states from using literacy tests as a qualification for voting. The Supreme Court, in Katzenbach v. South Carolina (1966) held that, pursuant to Section 5, Congress was empowered to ban the use of literacy tests in states where Congress believed the tests were being used to evade the requirements of the Fifteenth Amendment.

Any way you look at it, that's Congressional power.

106 posted on 05/29/2002 11:50:29 AM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson