Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
What are the odds that an "errant shot" would damage the plane's controls so badly that it would crash? (I discount the "errant shot striking a passenger" argument, since while that would be a shame, it would be more of a shame for a terrorist to bring the whole plane down.)

Walter Williams just commented that many airline pilots are ex-military, and there is that very good point about eye-hand co-ordination, not to mention the ability to concentrate successfully on a very complex task!

Finally, what's the significance of today's announcement from Mineta and Ridge? Surely they're not the "final word" here? My theory: this is a "prod" to get Congress to pass a law, which is probably what it would take, and likely what the Prez. really wants...

105 posted on 05/21/2002 9:33:30 AM PDT by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 88keys
what the Prez. really wants...

Yeah, keeping pilots from being armed is part of an ingenious plan to arm pilots.

And black is white
And up is down
And war is peace
And freedom is slavery
And ignorance is strength.

111 posted on 05/21/2002 9:40:14 AM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson