Replies

As a fairly recent lurker and infrequent contributor to FR, I must admit I enjoy heated threads like this one.

You complain of rage.
An observation, subjective, perhaps meaningless, yet possibly intimating the truth.

I do not read, I listen to to FR. The greatest rage on this thread seems to emanate from you.

"stick it"? Download a text to speech engine and see for yourself.

I did lose my temper last night. My apologies. It enrages me when people are so careless and indifferent about abortificants. The callous views against the human condition set me off.

Post #57 only mentions one date Aug 15, 1930. What is the time frame of for comparison of how human life was valued BEFORE contraception was widely accepted vs. how human life is valued AFTER contraception was widely accepted.

Lori--I am not going to do your work for you. Go to the article, find the paragraph and read from there. That said, I have no confidence that you will comprehend it. This is like pounding sand. The bottom line is that you are pro-contraception and will not accept the truth that it has led to abortion--if you can't understand that is a specific devaluing of life, nothing more I could ever say will convince you.

Regards.