Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: codebreaker
The truth is that for all the niceties exchanged on talk shows and with his colleagues, he was deeply intolerant of anyone willing to challenge him with resaonable discourse on creation vs. evolution theory.

Being that this is a primary affront to God, the professor should know what to expect.

This is a primary affront to God in what way? How was he deeply intolerant? What did he do to show that intolerance? How do you define intolerant?

325 posted on 05/21/2002 7:44:12 AM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]


To: JediGirl
Continually denying God is a primary sin that one of the most hurtful in existence.

I just hope he came to his senses in those last 3 months when he was racked with cancer.

It couldn't have been easy for him or his family.

331 posted on 05/21/2002 7:52:56 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]

To: JediGirl
Goulds intolerance is defined by his questioning tactics in his classrooms for pressing him on proving evolution theory is law.

Of course, Gould as a true scientist could not make such a claim so he chose to attempt to humiliate those who would challenge him. (sometimes successfully, sometimes not)

344 posted on 05/21/2002 8:20:28 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson