Replies

I know the Bush administration is trying their best to plug the holes left after 8 sorry years of treasonous activity by the previous administration. I have no doubt they have their hands full trying to repair years of damage. I'm not placing the blame on them. But it's going to take more time than we have, I'm afraid.

I wonder how much longer before we as a country realize we are allowing snakes in the grass to invade us. People who do not want to assimilate into their chosen land of immigration should not be allowed to stay. They should stay in their own lands if they don't like it here. I'm sorry to sound so regressive, but this is just going too far.

There should be some sort of loyalty oath that new immigrants take, and if they do one thing to show that they're not loyal, then they have to be deported.

During WWII, people must have been smarter. They were on the watch for any Germans or Japanese who tried to infiltrate the US and England. But today we have to allow our enemies to live here and wage jihad on us.

Well, the only solace I have is that we're all in the same boat, and those who are responsible for endangering this country's safety will have to suffer with the rest of us.

I agree, new immigrants should take a sworn oath of loyalty. I think Michael Savage said it right several months ago when he suggested that we need to establish a new House of UnAmerican Activities, like we had during the McCarthy era. Now that we know what anti-American ideas can do to our country, the Left needs to start rethinking the years of slander against McCarthy.

How we deal with more terrorism here in the States will no doubt raise some interesting questions. For years now, we've had leaders who have advised Israel to just deal with and try to negotiate with very persistent terrorists. If we get to the point where we decide to shut out Muslims, our attempts to be peace dealers in the Middle East will become (more obviously) hypocritical.