AARLC demands The Congressional Democrats release their voting records on intelligence funding.

African-American Republican Leadership Council Press Release ^ | 19 May 2002 | Trueblackman

[hchutch]

I LOVE this one! Hits hard, and hits fast!

Keep hitting them!

[Trueblackman]

We intend to hit Democrats 24/7/365

[hchutch]

All right!

[stands2reason]

Here's some recent FR speculation: "We Have To Get Bush"

[Lopeover]

No he won't bite down, but we can.

[Lopeover]

Awesome. Thank you. Awesome.

[let freedom sing]

AARLC-- expose the Klintoons for their lack of intelligence, along with the Congressional RATs'.

[ncpastor]

Thank you, Trueblackman.

[Trueblackman]

You are welcome.

[CyberAnt]

There used to be a website called SenateVote.com. After impeachment, I think they changed their name to CongressVote.com. or something similar. They have all the congressional voting records already done for you. Another good source is the Christian Coalition. They keep excellent records. Saves us from a lot of work.

[cartoonistx]

Just a question about this. Aren't their voting records already public? Are some of these records sealed for some reason?

[justshutupandtakeit]

I don't complain about mudslinging by opponents only about the piling on by the "objective" media. If it played stories straight when one of the RATS popped off with a lie rather than report the LIE like it is the truth and the truth like it is a lie I would not complain about RAT lies. Then they would be obvious RATLIES and blow up in their faces. But the lyin' mthrfckng media hammers the GOP with the RATLIES even though they know they are RATLIES.

Even the media is coming up short now when they report the obvious RATLIE that Bush had a real warning about 9/11. Trying to fan that RATLIE into a fire blew up in the RATS and their faces.

Your point is also not appropriate since by demanding the RATS do it you take away the future lie that the material you present is false, misleading, out of context. By demanding that they do it you certify the accuracy or if they lie then can hammer 'em with the proof that they are lying. Much better tactics and not misleading deceptive or hypocritical at all.

It is called being SMART.

[Trueblackman]

Yes they are public but by demanding them you force democrats to admit that intel was not on their radar screens in the 1990's

[sarasmom]

It wasn't on their radar screens in the 80s either.It got progressively worse.According to a friend of mine who was still active intell in the 90s,CNN had better resources.

What did CNN know and when did they know it? Now that would be a really interesting investigation.

[truth_seeker]

The desparate dems didn't think this thing through. Now it will boomerang on them.

Short of the whole long list, it would seem to be fairly simple to research a few choice dems, like Daschle, Gephardt, Lieberman, Kennedy, and also to put figures on the final year-to-year budgets, approved by Clinton. Could be done in a few days, for publicity on the net.