Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John W
No, that doesn't make sense. Realize that the danger is in the TRANSACTIONS, not the amount. ANY transactions leave electronic and paper trails. It would be just the opposite: Bin Laden would want to go into such a transaction as heavy as possible---in for a penny, in for a pound.
15 posted on 05/19/2002 3:55:00 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: LS
Remember that bin Laden & Co are good at false documents and identity theft

Tracing the transactions would not be an issue, if by the time the investigators got around to trying to talk to the account holders, they would only discover the account holders did not exist or had disappeared, the addresses were abandoned buildings, and the money had already been wired overseas

Either that, or the people doing the trading were doing so in the arrogant belief that they could not be touched (like members of the Saudi Royal family)

It wasn't just those two airlines. Boeing saw large put volume (several million dollars worth), as well as insurance companies and other guys affected by the collapse of the WTC. Add up the millions, and you start talking about significant amounts of money. Maybe not by Federal Budget standards, but big money to non-governments

17 posted on 05/19/2002 4:07:29 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson