If you tone it down, people won't even know you're trolling.
it has been that way since an arbitrary decision was made to tax alcohol. and it changed when an arbitrary decision was made to entirely prohibit it, and reverse the decision later. if the claim of harm to an individual (a statist claim) is the linchpin of the reasoning to ban "drugs", there is more than enough evidence for anyone that alcohol has caused plenty of harm. btw, alcohol is a drug. a certain gang here, once decided it should be banned. later, another gang said it should be legal....
...as long as YOU dont make it yourself (freedom?), to threaten a tax base. alcohol agents used to be called REVENUE agents for a reason. yawn.