Well, see, on FR we have dialogue, not monologues. It's part of what makes newspaper useless... no chance to interact, no chance for clarification, no chance for anything except what the author asserts. I presume your experience at making unchallenged assertions is part of your problem here.
Yes, I would suppose that's right. Would you be willing to agree with me that if people put more thought into what they wrote, that the dialouge would be more productive?